30 year-old professional dancer, Irina, was driving her 2005 Acura RSX, a small two door sedan. As she slowed down for traffic, Defendant crashed into her car. The impact pushed her car into the car in front. A double impact. Irina was on her way to a theater performance she was choreographing.
Irina claimed the Defendant was distracted while talking on his cell telephone, failing to brake to prevent the accident.
Defendant admitted fault but claimed she suffered only sprains which should have been resolved in 6 months. Defendant claimed Irina was very active on social media, posting videos of herself dancing and traveling within months of the accident.
Irinaās chiropractor and neurologist testified she suffered a L/L5 board based disc protrusion at 4 mm effacing the anterior thecal sac. She underwent intra-articular faced joint injection.
Defendant hired a private investigator who conducted several days of surveillance. Irinaās attorneys turned the table and showed that the private investigator was interfering with her privacy.
Irina demanded policy limits of $100,000. Defendantās final offer was $50,001.
The jury gave Irina an award of $220,000.
Judge Daniel Nishigaya, Santa Clara Superior Court 21CV381929.
March 7, 2024
PRO TIPS
- Defendants often go overboard when trying a case against a PI victim.
- Secretly following a young professional dancer is PHD dumb. That one move destroyed Defendant's evidence and credibility.
|